In the use of full-band interference devices, customers may encounter situations where a single device is insufficient to cover the entire signal in larger rooms. In such cases, the addition of at least one more shielding device is necessary. This article aims to provide a simple analogy to understand the transmission and propagation distance of the shielding signal of a full-band interference device. Additionally, it will discuss the correct installation method when customers encounter insufficient coverage with a single device.
The Analogy:
The transmission and propagation distance of the shielding signal of a full-band interference device can be compared to the spread of sound. For instance, when a person speaks loudly, the sound can spread up to 50 meters. If two people stand together and speak with the same volume, their combined voices will still only spread up to 50 meters. Adding another person’s voice does not increase the propagation distance from 50 to 100 meters. Similarly, when a customer encounters a situation where a single full-band interference device is insufficient to cover an indoor space, simply adding another device and separating them in a cellular layout does not guarantee the desired outcome.
Popular Signal Jammers For Sale
The Reality:
The shielding signal emitted by a full-band interference device is essentially a chaotic and disorderly interference signal. It belongs to a type of radio frequency wave. When multiple radio waves are simultaneously emitted from the same location, their radio frequency power does not simply add up. Therefore, the combined effect of two interference devices does not result in double the effectiveness. Consequently, the installation method of separating two shielding devices in a cellular layout to ensure coverage range does not achieve the desired outcome.
The Correct Installation Method:
When customers encounter a situation where a single full-band interference device is insufficient to cover an indoor space, a different approach is required. Instead of relying on a cellular layout, it is recommended to strategically position the devices to ensure optimal coverage. This method involves analyzing the specific layout and characteristics of the room to determine the ideal placement of the interference devices. By considering factors such as signal strength, interference sources, and potential obstacles, a professional installation can be carried out to maximize the coverage range.
Conclusion:
While the cellular layout may result in some overlapping coverage areas, it is not an effective solution for complete signal coverage. To ensure the desired outcome, it is crucial to adopt a strategic approach in the installation of multiple interference devices. By analyzing the room’s layout and characteristics, professionals can determine the optimal placement to achieve maximum coverage. This approach guarantees a more efficient and effective solution for customers facing insufficient coverage with a single full-band interference device.